<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Krunk4Ever! &#187; not always right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.krunk4ever.com/blog/tag/not-always-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.krunk4ever.com/blog</link>
	<description>After eliminating all other possibilities, the one remaining-no matter how unlikely-must be the truth.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Consumerist Banned Me From Commenting</title>
		<link>http://www.krunk4ever.com/blog/2008/07/01/consumerist-banned-me-from-commenting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.krunk4ever.com/blog/2008/07/01/consumerist-banned-me-from-commenting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Krunk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumerist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not always right]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.krunk4ever.com/blog/?p=1562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;ve been reading Consumerist pretty much since they&#8217;ve started and even advocated people to read them a long time back. Anyway, slowly and slowly, the quality of the articles have gone downstream and like mainstream media, they&#8217;re much more about trying to get more readers, often times posting stories that diverge from their helping [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;ve been reading Consumerist pretty much since they&#8217;ve started and even <a href="http://www.krunk4ever.com/blog/2007/01/16/consumeristcom/">advocated people to read them a long time back</a>. Anyway, slowly and slowly, the quality of the articles have gone downstream and like mainstream media, they&#8217;re much more about trying to get more readers, often times posting stories that diverge from their helping consumerist theme. And for quite some time, I&#8217;ve been commenting on how the quality of Consumerist has gone down hill and I can&#8217;t believe some of the crap they&#8217;re posting these days.</p>
<p>One such story was: <a href="http://consumerist.com/tag/gas/?i=5020267&amp;t=buy-super+cheap-costco-gas-without-costco-membership">Buy Super-Cheap Costco Gas Without Costco Membership</a>. This was a story advocating readers to defraud Costco, where there was a trick to allow any American Express card user to purchase Costco gas without having a membership. This trick has been around for quite some time, but it does NOT belong on Consumerist, nor should they be advocating readers to defraud a company.</p>
<p>I posted the following comment:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://gallery.krunk4ever.com/v/Misc/consumerist-banned-me-from-commenting-2.png.html"><img class="alignleft" style="float: left; margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" src="http://gallery.krunk4ever.com/d/18085-2/consumerist-banned-me-from-commenting-2.png" alt="Consumerist Banned Me From Commenting" width="150" height="150" /></a> Consumerist has long forgotten the difference between a &#8220;deal&#8221; and &#8220;illegitimate loophole&#8221;. I&#8217;m waiting for the day they start posting price mistakes. Whatever gets readers, right?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying I&#8217;m all high and mighty and won&#8217;t try my hand at ordering what is obviously a price mistake once in awhile. I&#8217;m saying crap like that does NOT belong in Consumerist.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like those security hole researchers. When they find a security hole in a software, they don&#8217;t go and tell everyone how to do it and then ask if it&#8217;s ethical. They try to contact the software company first and hope the issue a fix fast.</p>
<p>I guess we can never really expect Consumerist to be of that quality. And yet I had high hopes when they just started. Sigh&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>I guess it finally struck a nerve because when I went to post a comment yesterday, I saw this:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://gallery.krunk4ever.com/v/Misc/consumerist-banned-me-from-commenting-3.png.html"><img src="http://gallery.krunk4ever.com/d/18087-2/consumerist-banned-me-from-commenting-3.png" alt="Consumerist Banned Me From Commenting" width="104" height="104" /></a><br />
Comments are <strong>not</strong> enabled for this account but you can still clip articles and follow friends. If you have any questions about your status, please send us an email from your profile page.</p></blockquote>
<p>Then I went to my profile and saw this:</p>
<p><a href="http://gallery.krunk4ever.com/v/Misc/consumerist-banned-me-from-commenting-1.png.html"><img src="http://gallery.krunk4ever.com/d/18083-2/consumerist-banned-me-from-commenting-1.png" alt="Consumerist Banned Me From Commenting" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p>I guess Consumerist has no problem criticizing other companies, but when people start criticizing them, they ban users from commenting. I&#8217;m actually surprise that comment hasn&#8217;t been deleted yet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not really that avid of a commenter, but I do have <a href="http://consumerist.com/people/krunk4ever/comments">125+ comments</a>) under my belt and they&#8217;re not junk comments like half of what gets posted on Consumerist these days.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve sent an email to them asking why comments were not enabled for my account anymore and am awaiting their reply.</p>
<p>Interestingly, they posted a story I had submitted to them earlier this week: <a href="http://consumerist.com/tag/walmart/?i=5020643&#038;t=wal+mart-fails-to-change-your-oil-and-lies-about-it">Wal-Mart Fails To Change Your Oil And Lies About It</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Tipster <strong>Toland</strong> pointed us toward the Stonecipher Report which contains an entry about a weary traveler who, against his better judgment, decided to get his oil changed at Wal-Mart [...]</p></blockquote>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m much more of a fan of this new anti-consumerist site: <a href="http://notalwaysright.com/">Not Always Right | Funny &amp; Stupid Customer Quotes</a></p>
<p><ins datetime="2008-07-01T22:49:12+00:00"><strong>Update</strong></ins>: Just got a reply back from them:</p>
<blockquote><p>You&#8217;re a go for comments!</p></blockquote>
<p>Guess I got a nice moderator this time, though I didn&#8217;t really get a reason why I was banned in the 1st place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.krunk4ever.com/blog/2008/07/01/consumerist-banned-me-from-commenting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
