男女各階段想靠近的對象

Got this hilarious analysis from Mechy:

男女各階段想靠近的對象

【0 – 5 歲的時候】
女→媽媽。
男→媽媽。

【6 – 10 歲的時候】
女→不是討厭的男孩子就可以了
男→可以陪我欺負女孩子的男孩。

【11 – 15 歲的時候】
女→十五六七八歲的大哥哥,千萬不要同年紀那班野蠻人
男→足球,籃球,網球,乒乓球……

【16 – 20 歲的時候】
女→我要十七八歲差不多年紀大家都說讚的「大帥哥」
男→女人,女人就可以了

【21 – 25 歲的時候】
女→25-29歲的成熟男人,要有事業基礎,有品味,才華……
男→20-24歲漂亮又有身材的女人。

【26 – 30 歲的時候】
女→仍是堅持要比自己年紀大的男人。
男→20-24歲漂亮又有身材的女人。

【30 – 40 歲的時候】
女→心靈契合的好男人。
男→20-24歲漂亮又有身材的女人

【40 – 50 歲的時候】
女→男人。
男→20-24歲漂亮又有身材的女人

【50 – 60 歲的時候】
女→可與他終老的男人。
男→20-24歲漂亮又有身材的女人。

【70 – 80 歲的時候】
女→五六十歲時找到的那個男人,最好不需要自己照顧的。
男→20-24歲漂亮又有身材的女人。

【80 – 90 歲的時候】
女→比自己遲死的男人。
男→雖然我已經老花眼,看不清楚……但是我還是希望是20-24歲……

總結:男人打從20歲後,對女人的需求就十分專一。

English Translation:

Male’s/Female’s idea of the ideal partner at different stages of his/her life

[0 – 5 years old]
Female –> Mommy.
Male –> Mommy.

[6- 10 years old]
Female –> Boys who don’t annoy me.
Male –> Boys who can accompany me to bully girls.

[11 – 15 years old]
Female –> 15, 16, 17, 18 year old guy, can’t be one of those barbaric guys from the same grade.
Male –> Football, Basketball, Tennis, Ping Pong Ball…

[16 – 20 years old]
Female –> I want an around 17 or 18 year old guy that everyone calls “good looking”.
Male –> Girl, any girl will do.

[21 – 25 years old]
Female –> 25-29 year old mature man, needs to have a career, taste, and talent…
Male –> 20-24 year old woman that’s pretty and has a nice body.

[26 – 30 years old]
Female –> Still stubborn about the man needing to be older than myself.
Male –> 20-24 year old woman that’s pretty and has a nice body.

[30 – 40 years old]
Female –> Good men who can connect.
Male –> 20-24 year old woman that’s pretty and has a nice body.

[40 – 50 years old]
Female –> Any man.
Male –> 20-24 year old woman that’s pretty and has a nice body.

[50 – 60 years old]
Female –> A man that I can live till the end with.
Male –> 20-24 year old woman that’s pretty and has a nice body.

[70 – 80 years old]
Female –> The man I found when I was 50-60 years old, as long as he can take care of himself.
Male –> 20-24 year old woman that’s pretty and has a nice body.

[80 – 90 years old]
Female –> Man that will die later than myself.
Male –> Even though my eye sight is already pretty bad and can’t see clearly… but I still hope for a 20-24 year old…

Conclusion: Once a male reaches 20 years old, his demand in a woman is very pinpoint and unwavering.

Panasonic KX-TG5421S 5.8GHz Digital Cordless Phone

So someone on FW posted about a week ago that Costco was selling a Panasonic 5.8GHz cordless phone for $30. I couldn’t believe it. The past few times I dropped by Costco to check out the phones (needed a second one because I have 2 VoIP lines), all their Panasonic 5.8GHz cordless phones were over $100. In fact I’ve checked every single time (maybe not the last time I went).

But I was due for a Costco run this week. My snacks in my office had run out and decided to spin over the phone section to check it out. Apparently they’ve moved the phone section right next to the entrace (the unpopular side). Guess not that many people were looking for phones. The funny thing is that, they now carry 2 Panasonic 5.8GHz Cordless phones less than $100. One for $29.99 and another for $59.99. The $59.99 I believe was expandable to x number of handsets. I don’t remember the model number, but it’s not on Costco.com.

The one I purchased was the Panasonic KX-TG5421S 5.8GHz Digital Cordless Phone for $29.99. I had some requirements for the phone I was going to purchase:

  1. It had to be 5.8GHz – I already have a 900MHz phone and the quality gets pretty bad when I start walking around room to room. I also didn’t want a 2.4GHz so it’ll conflict with my WiFi.
  2. I was hoping for Panasonic – Uniden and others may have worked, but I was only willing to pay a premium for Panasonic.
  3. I was hoping to purchase at Costco – Having several Uniden cordless phones die on me over the past years, I wanted to purchase one from somewhere with a good return policy
  4. It had to be cheaper than $10 (non-panasonic) or cheaper than $50 (panasonic).

Welp, I guess my patience have been worthwhile:

Panasonic KX-TG5421S

Some things that are lacking in this model is an answering machine. However, both my VoIP service come with voicemail which emails me the messages directly, so I wasn’t looking for one with an answering machine in the 1st place. I haven’t played with it’s features that much yet, but there is this neat speakerphone on the handset itself. I was speaking to my dad for almost 2 hours through it today and it was fine. I haven’t tested it’s range yet, but when I do, I’ll post an update.

This model doesn’t seem that popular online: PriceGrabber, but as you can see, all of them are selling for at least $40. Amazon.com has the item page, but isn’t selling it personally. There might even be profit to be made reselling them.

//krunk (^_^x)

Random Crap

Today’s Japanese phrase is: 力 (chikara) – force; strength; energy; might; power; agency; authority; influence; vigor; vigour; stress; emphasis; exertions; endeavors; endeavours; efficacy; help; support; good offices; ability; faculty; capability; attainment; means; resources;
If you watch Naruto, the phrase チャカラ (chakara) is derived from this word, which is usually to used to describe power

Open Letter to the Mac Community (from /.) – The Truth Behind the iPod Nano “Scratch” Class Action Suit. Bits and pieces from the letter:

What You Don’t Know About The Nano Suit
The truth is that I never sought out nor did I ever hire David P. Meyer & Associates or Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro to represent me in any case, much less the iPod Nano Class Action suit.

I emphasized that I did not have any access to any specific data about the materials used in making the iPod Nano. David P. Meyer & Associates used my personal comments and opinions as the basis of the iPod Nano suit. To my knowledge, there was no actual technical study done on the iPod Nano before the Class Action suit was filed.

Additionally, I told David P. Meyer & Associates that I wanted to remain private, and that my wish for privacy, among other considerations, would preclude me from getting involved in the case.

Google results for my name skyrocketed. I began getting hate mail from people upset about the iPod Nano suit. I had to take my website down and remove legitimate references to my name on numerous web services. My fiancee and I were afraid to go outside in our own home town for fear of recognition and reprisal.

A SLAPP In The Face
On May 1, 2006, David P. Meyer & Associates and Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro defense lawyers filed Motions to Strike the entirety of my case against the two firms despite evidence that I had unwillingly and unknowingly been made Lead Plaintiff in the iPod Nano Class Action suit. In their Motions to Strike my case against them, they also requested of the Court that I be held financially responsible for their attorneys’ fees and costs.

Husband, Wife, Child Share Same BirthdayA husband, wife and their first child beat enormous odds and share the same birthday. Evelin Alballat was introduced to Tony Osman several years ago by one of her relatives who learned they were both born on May 21. The couple married two years ago. … “I kept staring at the clock and wanted it to turn past midnight before I delivered my baby,” she said.

Video games can help cut surgical errorsSurgeons who warmed up by playing video games like “Super Monkey Ball” for 20 minutes immediately prior to performing surgical drills were faster and made fewer errors than those who did not, said Dr. James “Butch” Rosser, lead investigator on the study slated for release on Wednesday. Interesting… I wonder if I played videos prior to coding, would I make code faster and make fewer errors.

British mothers hooked on “powerpramming”But this is “powerpramming,” a new craze taking off in Britain in which new mothers are encouraged to use their offspring — and the inevitable baggage that comes with them — as exercise aids. Fitness expert Liz Stuart is immune to comments by bemused passers-by as she cajoles her students into doing another 20 deep squats or fourth set of bicep curls using their precious babies as weights.

Qatari pays $2.75 mln for mobile phone numberAt a charity event in the capital of Doha, a Qatari bidder paid $2.75 million for the mobile phone number 666-6666. That’s a pretty ominous number…

‘Stargazer’ Says He Fell Down ChimneyA man faces a burglary charge after police found him stuck in a chimney. Matthew Allen, 27, told police he fell down the chimney after going on to the roof of the house to look at the stars.

Apparently Apple is teaming up with Nike to produce shoes that can send data into the iPod Nano to store your running data: Nike+iPod Gear and NIKE+

cute black and tan hound mix puppy
Cute black and tan hound mix puppy (from B$)

Jimmy Kimmel gets bit by a snake. If you love cock, submit feedback telling me this is fake. (from RayAlome) Real or acting?

Robot Chicken Parody of Final Fantasy VII (from MS newsgroup) – Robot Chicken version of Final Fantasy VII characters working at a burger joint.

Atheist Nightmare (from Kalekkos) – Someone describes how God made a banana so that it fits directly into the human hand. The banana also has indicators to show whether it’s good or not: green for wait, yellow for good and black for bad. Chemistry, biology or sanity have nothing to do with this explanation. I can’t believe this guy is trying to use a banana to prove that God exists.

Teh maddEST SkiLLz YET!!! – Not exactly the best speller in the world, but his card trick is pretty impressive. I know a thin string is involved, but i have yet to figure out exactly how everything works. Video might require you to log in. For some reason it’s been flagged by viewers as “inappropriate” and must be 18+ to view. The only thing I could see that is “inappropriate” is the spelling and maybe the scary mask.

FIGHT OF THE UNIVERSE CHAPTER 5 NEO VS ROBOCOP (from RayAlome) – an edited clip done by AMDS Films. This clip was done by merging scenes from Robocop and The Matrix and it’s quite impressive of how nicely stitched together it is.

MacSaber: Turn Your Mac Into A Jedi Weapon (from /.) – Introducing MacSaber 1.0 Beta. Using your Mac’s sudden motion sensor, this software turns your computer into a Jedi weapon almost worthy of taking on the real thing by making authentic lightsaber sound effects. It senses speed for the lightsaber movement sounds and acceleration for different levels of striking sounds. Haha. No one ever said light sabers were cheap.

Myths and Truth about Men and Women

Myths and Truths (from Esca):

Some rants and accumulated experience about women. Men in happy marriages or stable relationships don’t need to read this; neither do men who get laid every week (or even every month). The “truth” I’m putting out here is for all of those men who, like me, worship women and can’t figure out why they keep getting screwed over and dumped. The myths are things that I used to believe before I wised up.

MYTH: Women want love and affection. Women want to be treated well. If you treat a woman well, she’ll treat you well.

TRUTH: Young women want whatever other young women want. They’re herd creatures. If you lavish a woman with love and affection she’ll think you’re doing it because nobody else wants you (which may be true) and she’ll dump you. In fact, if you do anything that betrays that you’re a loser that other women won’t touch, she’ll dump you. Why? Because she wants to impress her friends with what a great catch she’s made, and if she thinks that they wouldn’t want you, then she doesn’t want you either.

There are only three exceptions to this rule. The first exception is psychos, otherwise known as “witches, bitches, and crazy ladies.” They’ll stay with you because nobody else wants them, or because you’re the only one who put up with their abuse. The second exception is women who like to “fix men up”: those women who like to take “broken” men and turn them into the man they want. These women are single because a mature man will recognize that these women don’t want him… they want to turn him into someone else. The third exception is that once in a long time you meet a woman who isn’t psycho, still wants to stay with you when she finds out that you’re not super stud, and doesn’t want to change you into someone else. This is the one you marry.

BITTER MYTH: Women are out for money.

TRUTH: Women are out for status and fun or for security, depending upon their age. A few women are out for cold cash, but not too many. Status-seeking women aren’t ready to settle down. They just wanna have fun, and they want their girlfriends to know it. They’re looking for a guy they can dangle in front of their friends and say, “Look what I got!” You don’t have to have money to be that guy, you just have to come across as desirable. Of course if you have money you don’t need to do anything else, but having no money isn’t the end of the world. The women who are out for security have had their wild fling and want to settle down. They want a guy who can provide a stable base for the future (and that includes finances).

All in all it’s sort of like what guys do (and women whine about endlessly): when you’re young you want some bright, bubbly thing with huge tits, a nice ass, and a trimmed bush who screams like a banshee in bed, although you’ll settle for much less; when you’re ready to get married you want a nice girl who isn’t going to break your balls. They’re usually different people unless you’re very, very lucky. Young women want bad boys who will show them a good time. When they’re ready to get married they want some guy who is going to be able to pay to keep them comfortable.

MYTH: Women are out for looks.

TRUTH: See above. Women are out for looks, after a fashion. A guy in good physical shape who wears decent-looking clothes is attractive because he looks after himself and probably isn’t a wimp or a whiner. She can convince her friends that he’s a “catch.” A guy who looks and smells like a laundry bin, or who can’t climb a few flights of stairs without a rest had better have some spectacular attribute to show off to her friends (like being a genius) or he’s not worth her time. Any guy can compensate for lack of looks or lack of money with showmanship. He doesn’t have to be a catch, just seem like one. All he has to do is make her friends think, “Damn, I wish I were going out with him instead of the loser I’m with.”

MYTH: I should find one woman I like who likes me, and stick with her through thick and thin.

TRUTH: This is the biggest mistake I ever made. I used to be loyal to whomever I was with, even when someone better came along. All that happened was that I missed out on some great opportunities while I hung on with losers that ended up dumping me anyway. Do this if the two of you are getting married; once you’ve tied the knot it’s a whole other can of worms. However, if you’re just dating, do exactly the opposite. In very subtle ways you have to let her know that although you like her, there are lots of other women out there and you still notice them. Glance at tits and legs. Smile at and chat with pretty ladies, even while she’s with you (you’re just being friendly, of course). This is the most important thing I’ve learned about dating in a decade. I even thought of dating WASP bitches again, so long as I could keep this in mind. Never, never let her know that she’s the only game in town. As soon as she believes that she’s your “everything,” she’ll start whining and bitching and making demands.

Think of it like buying a car. If you let the salesman know that this is your dream car, that you’ve stayed awake nights thinking about buying exactly this car, do you think the price will go down? Of course not! He’ll jack the price up as high as he thinks he can go and still have you buy it. If you tell your girl that you’ve dreamed all of your life of going out with someone like her, do you think she’ll smile and kiss you and things will go on as before? Of course not! She’ll realize that you’ll put up with more of her bad habits, and that she can put up with fewer of yours, and the bitching will start. She’ll try to make the relationship as comfortable for her as possible and still keep it going. Remember the car salesman? Remember the attitude that “this is a nice car, but there are hundreds of other great ones, including that one across the street”, even as your heart is thumping and you’re practically drooling? If you’re just dating, this is the attitude to take.

MYTH: Having a girlfriend / fiancée / wife means being able to tell someone my problems.

TRUTH: Nobody gives a shit about your problems. Nobody ever will. I know that sounds harsh, but it’s the reality of being a man. Want to tell people about your problems? Get a sex change. Or join a men’s group; the flip side is that you have to listen to their problems, but it helps. I know of only two kinds of women who want to hear about your problems: ones with far more problems than you have, and ones who fancy themselves amateur psychiatrists and like “fixing” men. Neither is good company. Let’s face it: many women spend all day whining to their friends about how awful their lives are and listening to their neurotic friends responding in kind. The last thing they want to do is go out with you and hear more of the same.

To make matters worse, women simply don’t “get” many of men’s problems. Women have problems with things that don’t even bother us, but they expect us to be understanding or at least tolerant; we have problems with things that don’t even bother them, and no amount of explaining will cause the light to go on or elicit any sympathy.

So why not just commit hara-kiri now? Because it’s not that bad. You get over it. In particular, once you figure out how to handle women a lot of your problems seem smaller and more manageable.

MYTH: Having a girlfriend / fiancée / wife means someone will finally understand me.

TRUTH: Understanding—true understanding—takes decades. If you spend most of your time with the love of your life trying to explain yourself, she will have nothing but contempt for you, for two reasons. First, because she doesn’t want to hear your whining (see above). Second, and more important, women want to maintain the self-delusion that they already understand men. Women everywhere claim that they understand men and that “men are simple creatures.” The truth is that women haven’t a clue where most men are coming from and furthermore they care only insofar as they want to control us. Nonetheless, they want to maintain the fiction that they have us figured out.

It’s a pride and status thing. A woman who doesn’t “understand” her man can’t control him, and a woman who can’t control her man is a loser. The more you try to explain yourself, the more complex and multi-dimensional you become (a.k.a. “difficult”), and the less she can claim to understand you.

Besides, most of the time you’re explaining yourself to her you’re really trying to figure yourself out. Go do it in a corner, hire a professional listener, or join a men’s group. She doesn’t want to hear it. If you master the art of keeping your problems to yourself she will complain bitterly about this. She will bitch and whine that you’re not open enough and that she has to drag things out of you. She will also secretly love this. It gives her one more thing to complain about to her friends.

MYTH: If only I could meet the right woman, my life would have meaning.

TRUTH: If your life doesn’t have meaning right now, when you’re single, then a relationship isn’t going to help. You’ll pile too much baggage on top of the delicate emotional bonds too early, and the whole thing will collapse like a house of cards. Want to see this in action? Watch women: they do this all the time. In particular, women who whine about men who can’t make a commitment are probably doing exactly this: looking to a man to make their life mean something. It doesn’t work.

The only way to have a happy life is to develop one for yourself, then leave an opening for someone else to come and share it with you. Neither of these two things is easy. In particular, it’s too easy once you’ve developed a life for yourself to end up with someone who was doing exactly what you were doing before—waiting for Prince Charming (or in your case Lady Love)—to come and rescue her life. People like this end up draining away all of that energy you’ve worked so hard to build up, leaving you exhausted and frustrated.

Take it from me: I waited for Lady Love for decades. Finally I gave up, got angry, got off my ass and tried to make a life for myself, and suddenly I was surrounded by women who wanted to date me. After a while I met someone who was very special to me and I married her. Now my life is about the same as before, but I have someone with whom to share it. As much as I prefer being with someone, I must tell you that having her with me doesn’t make my life any more or less meaningful. I’m pretty much where I was before, only now I have company, which is nice.

[P.S.: After two years she turned into one of those people who was waiting for her life to mean something, and she drained away all of my good energy. Oh well. Some things just don’t turn out as planned, no matter how hard you try. Rats.]

MYTH: If I treat a woman well and listen to what she says, she’ll stop complaining

TRUTH: Women never stop complaining. For them, it’s a sport. Some complain more than others, but none of them will ever stop, any more than one day men will stop discussing football. Men have built civilizations, created law, invented husbandry (that’s keeping domestic animals by the way, not marriage; women invented marriage), built skyscrapers, invented cars, washing machines, antibiotics, toilets, computers, and microwave ovens, and generally dragged us out of caves and into condos. Don’t kid yourself: men did it all. If it were up to women we’d still be living in caves and dying at 20. I know that men did it all because I know why they did it: they hoped that it would stop women complaining. It didn’t.

If you listen to your girlfriend’s bitching and try to make everything better, you’ll suffer the same fate as all the men who came before: you’ll run yourself ragged, and at the end of it all she’ll still be bitching. If you ignore all but the most important complaints, she’ll bitch about that, too, but you’ll feel far better about your life.

MYTH: Men don’t listen to women because men don’t care about women.

TRUTH: Men ignore women because women normally have nothing worthwhile to say. This is not a condemnation of women, but rather a difference in what talking is for. This is one of the few areas where John Gray has something useful to say. Men mull things over, organize things in their heads, then speak. Men have to do this because they have to get things done, and if they blabbered all day long about nothing in particular then eventually other men would pay them no attention. Men talk to communicate ideas, negotiate compromises, and secure cooperation. Life and experience has taught men to be brief and pithy.

Women talk to organize their thoughts. It’s the difference between doing the math problem in your head and writing the answer at the top of the page, and scribbling all over the page in order to arrive at the answer in the bottom corner. Women want men to listen to them. Women want men to follow along as they scribble all over the page, not just wait for the answer. Quite frankly, who cares? As I mentioned above, there are lots of things that women don’t want to hear from men. If you want to talk about these things, you’ll have to find some other men who want to listen, because she sure as hell won’t. If she wants to attach her mouth to her brain and vocalize all of her mental processes then she should find someone who cares to listen, in other words another woman.

MYTH: She said she loves me. She must think I’m really special.

TRUTH: When women say, “I love you” it can mean almost anything. “I want to spend the rest of my life with you,” “I’m desperate to get married and have babies and you’re the best thing I’ve come across so far,” “You’re better than the last jerk I went out with,” “You’re the best guy I’ve come across this week,” “All my girlfriends are in love and I want to be too,” “I have a million problems and I want you to feel obliged to listen to them,” “I want another date and I want you to feel like you have to ask me out again,” “It’s time I put my foot down and started controlling you,” and any number of other things. OK, most women think they mean it when they say, “I love you.” However, remember the old saying, “It’s a woman’s prerogative to change her mind”? She loves you this minute. Maybe today. Maybe this week. Maybe even this month. However, this says nothing about how she will feel next month, next week, or tomorrow.

One of the biggest problems men like me have is that when we say, “I love you” to a woman we want to really mean it. Like “I love you forever.” Men don’t understand that a woman can say, “I love you forever” and change her mind next week. All she does is convinces herself that in hindsight, and despite everything you’ve ever said or done, you never really loved her, so all the times she said, “I love you” didn’t really count. You have to learn to use the same language. Go ahead and say, “I love you,” but inside your head say, “I love you right now. Tomorrow may be a different story.” When you break up and she screams that you said you loved her, tell her that you did, but she did this and that and now you don’t love her any more. When women say, “I love you” they aren’t promising eternal devotion, so why should you be? One day you’ll meet a woman who says, “I love you” and it’ll really hit home. You’ll test her love a bit and it will hold up. That’s the one you marry.

MYTH: Women understand relationships; men don’t.

TRUTH: This myth is perpetuated by women, pussy-whipped men, and psychiatrists. If women truly understood relationships… that is, if they understood relationships with men… then we wouldn’t have a 45% divorce rate. Maybe back in the pioneer days women understood relationships. These days, they have coffee with their girlfriends, talk about “men”, examine and dissect relationships, study interpersonal dynamics, talk, talk, talk about what works and what doesn’t, then go out and perfectly screw up their next relationship. I know. I’ve watched it happen from the sidelines.

Women spend more time analyzing relationships; they talk about them incessantly, and in doing so discover more truths than men know. However, all of this talk in a vacuum also means that their heads are filled with more bullshit and myth than are men’s. The combination of superior insight and copious nonsense puts them right back where we are. Men tend to see what’s going on in a relationship more clearly, but have no idea how to express what they see or what to do about it. Women would probably know what to do about it if they could only see it as it truly is, instead of through a fog of preconception.

The other big difference between the sexes is that women are absolutely certain that they know what is going on, whereas men make no such claim. The last man who claimed to have his own radical theories about relationships was Freud, and nobody pays any attention to him any more. It is women’s ideas about relationships and why they do or don’t work that have been imported lock, stock, and barrel into the field of psychiatry. Most male therapists you’ll meet are basically honorary women with university degrees, and as such they don’t really understand relationships either.

MYTH: Women are fairer and more even-handed than men

TRUTH: Nothing could be further from the truth. Traditionally men have favoured the same rules for everyone: “He who lives by the sword dies by the sword.” Women on the other hand make up the rules as they go along. Although women’s approach is patently unfair, it was valuable when they had to be the ones to point out that the rules needed to be changed, or that the rules should be bent in some cases. Back then they did this for the good of everyone. These days men still feel bound by rules, but women are in a conflict of interest. They still keep watch over the rules and break them as they always have, but now they modify and break the rules in their own favour.

Men’s justice is often harsh, but it’s fair. Women’s justice is arbitrary and these days often self-serving. (Liberal “situational ethics” are essentially the same as women’s ethics.) You’ll find this out quickly in a relationship. The joke going around about “The Rules” and how women change them all the time isn’t such a joke. It’s a documentary. If you doubt this, think of it this way. A man caught breaking or bending the rules of good behaviour will become either defensive or repentant; his wife will beat him over the head with his transgression for months, if not years. A woman caught modifying the rules of good behaviour to suit herself will giggle and freely admit it. She thinks it’s a game.

MYTH: Women do a lot for the relationship; men do a lot for themselves

TRUTH: My ex-girlfriend invented a little ditty that made her puff up with smug, self-satisfied pride. It went like this, “Women think of ‘we’; men think of ‘me’.” OK, so e.e. cummings she wasn’t. The point is that she actually believed this, and a lot of other women do, too. She thought that she was living and breathing our “relationship,” while I was just kind of hanging around and taking up space. Meanwhile, I drove her everywhere (she couldn’t drive), I spent hours making her gifts and writing her notes, and I spent hours thinking about what was going on with us and where we were going.

The truth of the matter is that women don’t think of ‘we’ any more or less often than men do. Women think of their own needs most of the time, too. The difference is that women redefine their own needs as being those of “the relationship”. For example, when a man needs to talk to his belle about something, he says, “I need to talk to you.” When a woman needs to talk to her beau about something, she says, “We need to talk.” Notice the difference? Suddenly what she needs becomes what we need. Women do this all the time, and then pout and whine that they work so hard at the relationship and you don’t. In fact they’re just playing with words.

The other truth is that there are two relationships: the one you’re really in—the one that exists between you and her—and the one in her head. Remember how women are always talking and theorizing about “relationships”? Well, much of what she defines as “our relationship” is really just a collection of theories and prejudices from past conversations with her girlfriends, and has nothing to do with what’s going on between the two of you. In that sense, even if she is doing more for “the relationship,” it isn’t necessarily anything that concerns her real relationship with you.

MYTH: Women are more involved in the relationship; men are more aloof.

TRUTH: Finally one that’s true. The false part is the assumption that being deeply involved in the relationship is always a good thing, and that aloofness is fatal to relationships. If you doubt this, look around you and find a couple in which both people do little else but sit around with each other and talk, and watch how fast the relationship blows itself apart. Every relationship has to have a balance between looking inward and looking outward. Most women who complain that their men don’t pay enough attention to “the relationship” aren’t seeing the relationship clearly and/or are buried in “the relationship” up to their necks and so are creating more problems than they solve. Recently I was skimming a book by Dr. Laura and saw a chapter that gets this one right. Where is it written that when a man wants to go back to college and a woman wants to get married, and she gets angry that he’s “not thinking of the relationship” that she’s automatically right? Maybe the right thing to do at that moment is for both of them to go back to college for a couple of years. Women confuse obsessing about “the relationship” with healthy involvement, particularly considering that half the time they’re seeing stuff that isn’t even there. Sometimes your relationship needs more attention than you’re giving it; other times she’s smothering it. The assumption that more involvement equals more love simply isn’t true.

MYTH: When she says no, she means no (so why am I so confused)?

TRUTH: Nobody means no every time they say “no.” Think about it: do you? You’ve never said no when you were too shy to say yes? You’ve never said no because you were nervous, didn’t know what you were getting into, and didn’t really have time to think about your answer? You’ve never said no because you thought that was the right thing to do even though you really wanted to say yes? You’ve never said no and then changed your mind? You’ve never said no as a joke, just to get a rise out of someone, when you really meant yes?

I’ve done all of these things at one time or another; most men I know have, and most women I know have as well. However, for men there’s a catch. If she’s prone to saying no when she really means yes, then you should dump her. Immediately. Especially if she’s told you in no uncertain terms “no” and then starts dropping huge hints that you’re supposed to ignore this and go for it anyway. Dump the bitch. This is just far too dangerous. If you doubt this, imagine sitting in court, accused of rape. “Did she tell you no, Mr. Smith?” “Yeah, but afterward she tried to rip my pants off, then stripped naked and sat on my face!” “But did she say no, Mr. Smith?” “Umm… yes she did.” “Case closed.”

I once went out with a woman who told me, on our second date, that there was no way she would sleep with me, that her ex-boyfriend was coming to visit and that it would be “too complicated” if she were sleeping with me when he came to stay. On our third date she did everything to let me know that she wanted me, including lying on my bed, making comments about removing her clothes for a nude massage. Spooked, I drove her home, dropped her off, and never went out with her again. I consider it one of the smartest things I’ve done in my dating life. (Incidentally, apparently so does she. Every time I meet her she asks why I don’t call her any more.)

MYTH: Women are social geniuses; all women get along well with each other, while men just fight

TRUTH: I lived in a mixed-sex dorm for two years in university where each floor was segregated by sex. It alternated: one floor men, one floor women, one floor men, etc. A few nearby residences were completely mixed. A couple of the men’s floors looked much the worse for wear at the end of the year. You know, men are so destructive. The women’s floors all looked perfect. All the girls were smiling and friendly. Talk to any of them, however, and they’d tell you that they hated living on an all-female floor, and every last damned one of them was moving to the mixed dorms the very next year, and not with each other. According to them, underneath the tidy rooms and smiles were claws and forked tongues. Every day was a quiet, mannerly, pitched social battle. The men, on the other hand, got along just fine with only a few exceptions. Most of us were quite happy where we were, the only complaint being that we didn’t see the ladies enough.

One thing that is true along the lines of this myth is that any woman will defend another woman against a man, even a woman that she doesn’t know. Start bad-mouthing women, even a particular woman that isn’t known to “present company,” and you’ll find women defending her even though they have no idea what’s going on. If anyone—a woman or another man—verbally attacks a man, other men will not jump in and defend him. Why? Men assume that other men can look after themselves and, after all, they’re competition. Women assume that an attack on one woman is an attack on all women.

BITTER MYTH: Women are all the same.

TRUTH: Women are not all the same, and in particular women change with age. A woman who wouldn’t give you a second look at 15 may be asking you out at 35. In part this is the dreaded “biological clock” at work, but in part it’s also changing priorities. At 15 she wants to impress all of her friends with her “catch” and she is starting to learn to control men. She wants variety and excitement. At 25 she wants to have fun with no strings attached and wants to hone her controlling skills. She wants more stability but she doesn’t want Ward Cleaver or Bill Gates. At 35 she realizes that the fun days are over and it’s time to settle down and get serious.

Boring, nerdy guys who were dog meat at 15 can be studs at 35. The guys grow up and mature, they learn to need women less, and they settle into a life of resigned solitude, which means that they cheer up because they’re no longer striving for something they can’t have. The field narrows, and there are fewer single guys with no divorce history. Finally, her priorities have changed. She’s no longer impressed by “bad boys” on motorcycles with a few convictions for petty crime. She knows that her friends aren’t impressed by flashy, fast-living rogues any longer, any more than they’re still impressed by fashions from Suzy Creamcheese. She’s more interested in building a nest than impressing her friends anyway (and she knows that building a nest is what will impress them). So, just because you can’t get anywhere now doesn’t mean that your whole life will be a write-off. Take a clue from me: I never had a single date in high school. I had one girlfriend for a year in University. Ten years later I was beating women off with a stick.

Random Crap

Today’s Japanese phrase is: 助けて (tasukete) – help!
Basically the phrase you scream when you need help. Sometimes used in conjunction with お願い (onegai) – please or 下さい (kudasai) – please (kana only); (with te-form verb) please do for me;

Someone commented on my All Tea Comes From One Species?:

liam Allen Says:

While it is true that all tea comes from one species, Camellia Sinensis, a look at Yunnan Province and Fujian Province in China will reveal that there are actually hundreds, if not thousands, of sub species of tea, many of which will not cross with each other sexually. Fujian province appears to have the largest number of wild tea sub species of any where in the world, while Yunnan appears to have the three oldest living tea trees in the world. Yunnan also appears to have the oldest tradition of tea use.

Think of tea plants as more like grapes, there are few species but a great many varietals. That is partly what produces the wide range of flavours in tea, but we must not discount the effects of terior and elevation and climate on the flavour of the tea. Certainly processing plays an important part in the tea flavour equation as well.

Non-scientific online references:
Fujian Tea: http://www.fzrm.com/Varieties%20of%20Tea%20tree.htm
Yunnan Tea: http://www.tuochatea.com/history_of_yunnan_tea.htm

Which I thought was an interesting. What the heck is sub species? Is that like the difference between an Asian homosapien and a African American homosapien?

Judge says man too small for prisonA judge said a 5-foot-1 man convicted of sexually assaulting a child was too small to survive in prison, and gave him 10 years of probation instead. In other words, if you’re 5’1″ or shorter, you automatically have a jail free card.

Armless man stopped for speedingAn armless man stopped for speeding was driving with one foot on the steering wheel and another on the pedals, a policeman testified in court. … He told the court he had been driving for years, using his feet to steer, and had never had an accident.

Circus strongwoman seeks phone books to save showA circus strongwoman who rips up telephone directories as part of her act has launched an appeal for 500 phone books to ensure her show in northern England can go on.

Freegans” forage for food in bins“Everything I eat comes from dumpsters,” Ash says. “For me it’s a logical lifestyle choice. It’s such a natural thing to use up that waste.” Some call them “dumpster divers”, others brand them “skip lickers”, but Ross Parry and Ash Falkingham like to count themselves among the Freegans — a growing band of foragers who seek to live entirely from the waste of others. … Freeganism, derived from the words “free” and “vegan”, is spreading to Britain from the United States, where one of its founding fathers, Adam Weissman, has set up a Freegan information Web site to persuade others to join him.

Honda says brain waves control robot (from /.) – In a step toward linking a person’s thoughts to machines, Japanese automaker Honda said it has developed a technology that uses brain signals to control a robot’s very simple moves. Neat!

18,000 pounds of fireworks seized in N.Y.Police officers who stopped a truck that was tailgating a fuel tanker on a highway say they made a potentially explosive discovery — 18,000 pounds of fireworks.

Windows Live Local has added a new feature: real time traffic, however it appears Yahoo! Maps has had this feature for awhile. The only one missing is Google Maps, but they’re probably going to have that soon too. They did reorganize the UI a bit. They still have the funky layout of the Search fo a busines or category before Enter city, address, or landmark, which I find odd and unintuitive. Also, going between Road/Aerial and Bird’s eye is a bit jarring and sometimes like getting directions doesn’t work in Bird’s eye view, but somehow it doesn’t seem to know how to switch back to Road/Aerial view. One thing that I always found neat is that the by holding the ALT key and drawing a box allows you to zoom into that area. No other online mapping software I’ve seen allows you to do that. Also, being able to right click and add a push pin and being able to get directions to that push pin is also quite handy. Often times I know where the location is, I just don’t know the address and would like to find the best route. Then there’s the scratch pad which is awesome and being able to share that scratch pad with anyone. I remember there was a maximum # of addresses you can add to it before, but I’m not sure if that restriction has been lifted. However, it seems if you login, you can save your scratch pad and have multiple scratch pads. For example, here’s the houses I went seeing today. #1 is Microsoft so I can tell the general distance between that house and where I work. The push pins weren’t added in any particular order if you were wondering…

MIT’s US$100 laptop prototype completedThe first working model of MIT’s $100 laptop was unveiled yesterday at the Seven Countries Task Force meeting. With a garish, bright orange and yellow exterior, swiveling wireless network antennae that look like little horns, and an unusually wide touchpad, the first working prototype of MIT’s much anticipated creation is a confluence of unique design decisions. The project is neat, but they really needed someone better in choosing the colors. It looks like one of those kid computers that teach them how to count. The color of the case has also become a target for criticism. Although I am not particularly fond of the specific colors used in the prototype, I do appreciate the way that the unusual colors contribute to the distinctiveness of the OLPC laptop’s appearance.

Interesting comment from /. (#15396325):

We humans are such bonding creatures aren’t we? I actually realized this just last evening when I was playing the sims 2.

I had never played a sims game before, but all the excitement and buzz around spore made me decide to try out some of will wrights designs – so I picked up the highly reviewed sims 2.

I created a family and was amazed at how quickly I became attached to them. I feel so compelled to make sure that they are well fed and happy – and I have become extrememly preoccupied with making certain they all have positive relationships with each other.

Then I suddenly realized that these sims are programmed to age and eventually die! I then started another family which I care much less about and refuse to load my original family because I can’t bear the thought not only of their permanent passing – but of the distress it will cause the other sims!

Someday I will take them out of this suspended “animation” when I discover how to make them live indefinitely – either through game methods or life-saving game modding!

Random Crap

Today’s Japanese phrase is: 化け物 (bakemono) – goblin; apparition; monster; ghost; phantom; spectre; specter
Sometimes also used to describe a person who has no morals or ethics.

It’s been a while since my last Random Crap post, so this flood may continue for a few days.

final fantasy 8 - chibi squall and rinoa
Click image to start the animation or view it in the gallery.
Final Fantasy VIII – Chibi Squall and Rinoa (from Lsimyle)
Text: 只要能和你在一起, 失去一切都不可惜.
Translation: If I can only be with you, losing everything else won’t matter.

They’re so cute!

24 / 6 (from MsticAzn) – a parody video of 24 (Jack Bauer) done by some college friends of MsticAzn. Only lasts 4 minutes, but pretty funny and cheesy at the same time. The video effects were hilarious. They did borrow MGS3’s soundtrack which was a bit jarring at first.

What is a “Name Brand” laptop? (from AT) – Virtually none of the “Name” brands manufacture their own laptops, with the about the only exception being Asus. … The Dell Latitude and the Sony Vaio are made by Quanta, who also makes many of the IBM laptops, and the now-discontinued PowerPro C 3:16, and the new PowerPro G 3:8. Quanta is well known as one of the best and highest quality laptop ODM in the world. I wonder if Quanta still makes parts for the Lenovo Thinkpad.

my personal trading chart
My Personal Trading Chart (from MS newsgroup)

ccmexec.exe and inventory.exe – what are they and what do they do? (from Belldandy) – I referred to these two processes tangentially in Microsoft laptop gripes, but based on referrer hits and email they deserve a post of their own. Systems Management Server pushes out patches and keeps your software updated via an agent that’s installed on your PC. This agent shows up in task manager as CcmExec.exe (where ccm stands for change and configuration management), and in the services list as the SMS Agent Host. Normally ccmexec doesn’t do much, but (depending on your setup) it may periodically kick off an Office update process called inventory.exe. Doing an inventory involves a lot of disk seeking, and unfortunately SMS isn’t smart enough to notice if you’re actually using a laptop on battery power.

Interesting comment from /. (#15419111):

The articles hints at two forms of addiction.

  1. One form is simply that a game player likes the computer game. The player might spend hours on playing the game. A good example of an absorbing game is Netrek of the early 1990s. Many geeks at UC-Berkeley spent hours on playing this game instead of working on their Ph.D. dissertations.
  2. Another form is a means to escape an abusive household. The article at the “Washington Post” states, “‘I can understand my son’s suffering,’ she said. ‘He could never satisfy his father and was failing at school. But when he plays his games, he becomes an undefeatable warrior.'” When parents physically or emotionally brutalize their children, the victims try to flee to safety. In a Western nation, most people oppose child abuse and would offer to help the victims of abuse.

    In Korea, the story is quite different. In Korea, you would consider someone with different blood to be inferior and to be not worthy of your help. The overwhelming majority of adopted Korean orphans are adopted by Westerners. The typical Korean could not care less about orphans — or abused children. In this kind of cold, brutal environment, an abused child has nowhere to run. So, the child escapes into on-line gaming: a fantasy world where the abused child can have the wonderful childhood that he cannot have in real life.

The first form of addiction is probably acceptable, but the second form of addiction is not. The second form is a terrible cry for help.

I for one can speak of the amount of pressure Asian kids are typically under (especially if they’re parents have left their home country in order to find a better living for his descendants).

Top 10 Strangest Gadgets of the Future (from /.) – some of these gadgets are pretty cool (i.e. Scarpar – The All-Terrain Motorized Board and Heliodisplay M2i), while others make you think what the heck (i.e. Transparent Toaster). That Scarpar really reminds me of Detective Conan’s solar-powered skateboard.

3G phones banned in anti-porn driveCambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen has banned 3G mobile phones after a complaint from his wife and her friends about receiving pornography on them. Sigh… people can be so ignorant. Maybe they should be banning email too with all those enlarge penis spams.

Lovesick swan falls in love with swan paddle boatA swan has fallen in love with a plastic swan-shaped paddle boat on a pond in the German town of Muenster and has spent the past three weeks flirting with the vessel five times its size, a sailing instructor said Friday. I thought this was a sweet article and shows that animals can fall in love with inanimate objects just like humans can too (hugs iPod Nano).

Should three-year-olds have televisions in their bedrooms?How do you feel about letting young children watch television every day? If you’re like most parents, you feel a vague sense of guilt over the practice, but you do it anyway. That’s the conclusion drawn by a new study out from the Kaiser Family Foundation. The survey of more than 1,000 families shows that most parents have absorbed the message from their pediatricians that extended television time in a child’s earliest years should be avoided. Many Americans lead lives that are so busy, however, that the TV becomes an almost essential parenting tool. An interesting article I must say. I didn’t really get to watch much TV in my elementary school years. It wasn’t till Jr High or High School where I started watching more TV. When we did watch TV when I was young, it was mostly Chinese drama, so I miss a lot of cultural references that Family Guy often brings up today. But nowadays, I hardly ever watch TV. Anything I really want to watch, I can watch it on my computer (i.e. Animes, Movies, 24, etc).

The 25 Worst Tech Products of All Time (from /.) – These products are so bad, they belong in the high-tech hall of shame. #1 and #2 are held by AOL and RealPlayer. Windows ME comes in #4. However, saying IE comes in at #8 is debatable. IE has its share of faults, but I’d use it any day over what Netscape Navigator has become over the years. The Iomega ZIP drive comes in at #15. I loved my ZIP drive. It was that or floppies back then and we had a great deal of “sharing” games (i.e. Duke Nukem 3D) back then. Though the death click of those disks were pretty bad. The IBM Deskstar (Deathstar) and DigitalConvergence CueCat comes in #18 and #20 respectively. Free PCs comes in at #23. My dad actually got one of those free PCs filled with advertisements. My poor sister had to endure it because that was her computer. I had an Acer and my brother had a Packard Bell.

Chicken and egg debate unscrambled (from /.) – Now a team made up of a geneticist, philosopher and chicken farmer claim to have found an answer. It was the egg. Put simply, the reason is down to the fact that genetic material does not change during an animal’s life. Therefore the first bird that evolved into what we would call a chicken, probably in prehistoric times, must have first existed as an embryo inside an egg.

Western Digital Customer Loyalty Program

Apparently Western Digital has a customer loyalty program that gives pretty nice discounts (from SD):

What drives do they have?
– They have over 30 different models available. the popular ones in this thread are the 400GB SATA, 320GB SATA, and the 36GB Raptor.

WD3200JD SATA 150 MB/s 7200rpm 320gig 8.9 ms 8 MB cache $89
WD2500JD SATA 150 MB/s 7200 250 8.9 ms 8 MB $65
WD3200JB EIDE 100 MB/s 7200 320 8.9 ms 8 MB $97
WD2500JB EIDE 100 MB/s 7200 250 8.9 ms 8 MB $65
WD4000KD SATA 150 MB/s 7200 400 8.9 ms 16 MB $143
WD2500SB EIDE 100 MB/s 7200 250 8.9 ms 8 MB $77
WD360GD SATA 1.5 Gb/s 10,000 36 4.5 ms 8 MB $82

I have yet to find the entire list yet, but from what is shown, these are pretty good prices. The price includes shipping and other fees. These drives are brand new and come with 3 year warrant (5 if you order the Raptors). The only ceveat is the drive you use (serial number) to get this drive upgrade will have its warranty voided. However, drives with expired warranty apparently still work. You can order as many drives as you want, but each drive you order requries a unique serial number.

How can I upgrade or trade up my WD drive to a larger drive?

Western Digital has a WD Customer Loyalty Program that allows you to upgrade your current WD drive to a larger drive. Under the WD Customer Loyalty Program, you can purchase a new drive with the full manufacturer warranty at a discount price. Pricing and availability are subject to change.

If you are interested in the WD Customer Loyalty Program, please contact us at 1-800-275-4932. Please select Option # 4 in the phone menu to reach the WD Customer Loyalty department.

Enjoy!

Death Note Movie

So I’ve been following a manga some time back in college called Death Note (デスノーと). Scanlations had started and stopped and many new groups have taken over the project. I stopped reading after W,tF stopped scanlating and haven’t bothered finding the new group who took over. Death Note was drawn by the same artist who did Hikaru no Go ヒカルの碁.

The premise of the story is every Death God (死神 – shinigami) has a notebook. In traditional stories (at least in Chinese folk tales), this is a notebook of the list of all living people, when they’ll die, and how they’ll die. The twist in this story is that this notebook is in fact blank, and Death Gods can write who’s ever name they want and how they die. Somehow a boy named Raito (ライと – Light), a teenage geinus, gets ahold of one of these notebooks and learns about its mysterious power. Raito uses the notebook for justice, killing off criminals. However, these unexpected deaths have raised suspicion in the police and investigation agencies around the world. A world class detective named L (also a teenager like Raito) tries to locate the person everyone on the internet has been calling Kira (キラ) and now it’s the battle between 2 geniuses. So my spoilers stop there.

Is it grammatically correct to say “who’s ever name”? It just felt really weird.

So Lsiymle tells me today apparently they’re making a real live movie. This is pretty neat. I also find out that the manga had apparently ended. However, it doesn’t appear the movie will go past the initial Raito vs L fight, which is interesting enough already. I was actually sad at the outcome of Raito vs L, but for those who haven’t read it, I won’t spoil.

Do check out the manga version of Ryuk (the Death God):
death note raito and ryuk (ryuuku)

and the movie CG version:
death note movie ryuk (ryuuku) cg

The CG version is actually pretty close matching and pretty darn scary.

X-Men: The Last Stand

*** REMEMBER TO WAIT TILL THE END PAST THE ENDING CREDITS! THE 30 SEC CLIP IS WORTH IT! *** (from RayAlome)

Went to watch X-Men: The Last Stand last night with StanMan and ChemChampion. The movie was fun, but was a little disappointing when compared to the previous. Apparently this last movie was done by a different director. The previous ones were done by Bryan Singer, while this one was done by Brett Ratner. Apparently Bryan Singer decided to work on Superman Returns instead. Anyway, the movie felt like a completely seperate story on its own and lots of events happened that left the audience hanging and thinking why the heck did he do that?

Official Trailer
IMDb: 7.9/10 (1,141 votes)
Yahoo! Movies: The Critics: B- / Yahoo! Users: B+
Rotten Tomatoes: Rating: 52% / Average Rating: 5.8/10
Apple Trailer
Amazon.com DVD
Amazon.com Soundtrack
Amazon.com Showtimes

x-men: the last stand posterx-men: the last stand posterx-men: the last stand posterx-men: the last stand posterx-men: the last stand posterx-men: the last stand posterx-men: the last stand posterx-men: the last stand poster

Spoilers: (Show)

Out of curiousity for those who read the X-Men comic, did beast wear glasses in the comic book series? RayAlome and I were discussing this earlier and I remember Beast wearing glasses, while hanging upside down reading a book, but that was from the animated series. RayAlome points out the fact that Beast’s abilities include heightened senses and should not need glasses to have even better eye sight than regular humans.

Before we went to see the movie, we decided to have dinner at CPK. It’s been awhile since my last CPK visit. The last time was probably still back in Berkeley. The pizzas and atmosphere were pretty much the same. It was ChemChampion’s first time trying pizzas with weird and random toppings. We had purchased our tickets earlier and gotten there with about 10 mins to spare. There was already a long line that formed to get in the 10:40pm showing. But we decided to split up once we were in the theater and got pretty good seats.

After the movie, we haded back to my place to play DDR (well StepMania to be exact). We actually played quite a long time. I think we started around 12:30am and they didn’t leave till around 5am. We went through quite a few bottled water and gatorades, but it was fun. I finally got to utilize both my RedOctange Ignition 3.0 Dance Pads simultaneously. I didn’t go to bed till some time past 6am, but I got all the rest I wanted by waking up today at 5pm. Hehe.